Monday, January 4, 2010
Homework 19; term 2
Homework 18; term 2
-Russia over 20m
-Poland 6m
-Germany 4.2m
-Great Britain 388k
-China 2.2m
-Japan 2m
-France 600k
-USA 406k
2. Name two economic effects of the war.
-It helped America after the great depression because they were able to make weapons and sell them.
-All countires in Europe were in debt because the war went through Europe and their economy was doing badly. America gave them a lot of money; this was called the Truman Doctrine/Marshall plan.
3. Name two social effects of the war
-10 million Germans were forced to leave and make their way to West Germany so that no future German government would be able to claim those territories.
-In the USSR and Germany, extensive urban redevelopment took place as ruined cities had to be rebuilt.
4. Name two political effects of the war.
-The war causes the production of nuclear weapons.
-Europe's domination of the rest of the world ended.
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Homework 17; term 2
-Americans dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
-The Soviet Union launched a suprise invasion on the Japanese colony in Manchuria.
-Ultimately, Japan surrendered because there were thousands of casulaties.
Homework 16; term 2
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
Homework 15; term 2
Monday, December 14, 2009
Homework 13; term 2
Saturday, December 12, 2009
Homework 12; term 2
Sunday, December 6, 2009
Homework 11; term 2
Thursday, December 3, 2009
Homework 10; term 2
Homework 9; term 2
Wednesday, December 2, 2009
Paper 1 Practice; term 2
Homework 8; term 2
Homework 7; term 2
-The purpose of this book is to take a new look at the "age-old scourge" of war. The origin of this book is written by John G. Stoessinger, who has always been interested in the explanations of war ever since he was a student. The purpose of writing this book was also to give people a deeper understanding of the causes of wars, from his opinion. Specifically, the book talks about ten case studies of the major international wars fought in the twentieth century.
2. According to the book, who were Hitler's two main enemies? (28)
-the Communists and the Jews
3. What was contained in the "secret protocol" of the 1939 Nazi-Soviet Pact? (29-30)
-It would divide up Poland between two dictators.
4. According to the author, why did Hitler ally with Stalin? (30)
-Because he was going to invade Poland, and the only way that he could do this without risk was by allying with Stalin.
5. What territorial gains did Stalin make in 1939 and 40 that concerned Hitler? (31)
-Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania.
6. What two events accounted for a "crucial delay" of Hitler's attack on the USSR? (35-36)
-In October 1940, Mussolini decided to invade Greece in a surprise attack. Hitler ended up sending twelve divisions of German troops into Greece to help out Mussolini. The second event was called a "coup d'etat" which took place in Yugoslavia in March 1941. During this night, Prince Paul, who was becoming close to being "a puppet" of Hitler was overthrown. The Serbs made it clear that Yugoslavia's subservience to Germany had ended.
7. Please give a couple of examples of how Hitler and Goering intended to treat Russian Civilians and soldiers during the attack on Russia (36-38)
-He was going to make a fake lake, which would provide energy for an elecric power station. He planned on destroying the Russian culture so that it would no longer exist. He would banish books from being published, and kids would only be taught about obeying the German masters in their school.
Monday, November 30, 2009
Worksheet 5 "The Great Fatherland War"
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Homework 6; term 2
Friday, November 20, 2009
Class Work
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Homework 4; term 2
A:
1. Using sources A to D, describe how Polish civilians were affected by the invasion of their country.
-In source A, the people are affected because they are hearing that on the first day of were, 112 people were killed; they learn that of these people killed, 80 were women or children. In source B, this person is finding out that the town where their family had lived had been burnt down, and once again- people are fearing the Germans. In source C, the person makes references to piles of corpses of people and animals that are just laying in the streets. All of these sources are illustrating fear, and the loss of many humans.
2a. Why do you think source A to C are anonymous? Does this affect their value as evidence?
-These sources are anonymous because the people were obviously terrified of being killed, like everyone else who they were mentioning in their journals. I don't think it really effects their value, because even if we knew a name, it wouldn't change the message that was being conveyed.
2b. How does source D help you to use sources A to C?
-Source D is sort of a picture of everything that is going on, which people are talking about in all of the sources. It creates a mental image, at least for me, of how bad things really were, and what was actually happening.
2c. Suggest why the Polish Black Book, sources A to C, was published in Britain in 1940.
- I think it was to warn people more of what the Germans were doing, and give them a bit of awareness of how bad things could actually get.
2d. How valuable do you consider the Polish Black Book as evidence of the effects of Germany's invasion of Poland? Explain your answer.
- This is definitely an extremely valuable source as evidence, because it gives first hand accounts of what was actually going on. It is real people saying what they were witnessing- they weren't changing stories to make it seem more intense than it was, because the accounts were taken when things were actually happening.
B:
1. In sources A to D, what methods of warfare might be called humane?
-I don't really see any of these methods as humane. The first two sources are a bit less cruel than source C, but I don't think burning people's houses is very humane. I guess that as a method of warfare, the bombing and burning of houses would be the most humane in this situation though.
2. How do sources A to D suggest that the Germans did not use humane methods of warfare.
-Well, it is a bit unjust to just go around burning down people's houses. Also, there were masses of people and animals lying in the streets, which shows that maybe they killed an excessive amount of people that wasn't necessarily called for. By killing children, this was a bit inhumane as well, because the children were completely innocent.
3. Do source A to D prove that the Germans acted inhumanely? Explain your answer.
- I guess that these sources can't necessarily prove that they acted inhumanely, although it definitely suggests that they did. It's hard to say, because these are just personal encounters of people. It is also hard to say what is inhumane, it is almost like calling someone a monster.
C:
1. In Source E, how did the lives of people in the big house seem to have been affected by the start of war with Germany? How did their lives seem unchanged?
-Well, it just says that they were "air raid arrangements" which shows how it was affected by the war. However, everything was so custom to them- the different ways the floors were layed out, so their lives were basically the same as always. (I really don't know how to answer this question...)
2. Judging by Source F, how did the start of the war affect daily life in London?
-Well, the two business men, who previously would talk normally, now had to converse using gas masks.
3. Using E and F, suggest why British people in 1939 called the war the "phoney war."
-Well, it appears to these people as though nothing really changed in their lives. They lived in air-raid shelters, which were the exact same as what they were previously accustomed to.
4. For what other purposes could a historian use sources E and F as evidence?
-Well, it expresses what happened in the war according to the British people, and their views of the war, which is pretty significant and could be important.
Worksheet 2: "The Fall of Western Europe"
A:
1. What was Churchill offering the British in source A? What would have been the alternative?
-He is offering blood, toil, tears, and sweat. The alternative of this would be that they loose, because along with the blood, toil, tears, and sweat would come victory.
2.This speech was very popular among the British. Suggest why this is so.
-Well, I guess it is sort of motivational, and it shows that their leader, Churchill, is actually showing concern, and that he is trying his best to create a victory.
B:
1. What is an "armada" (lines 2 and 15)? Suggest why the Daily Express used this word to describe boats which rescued soldiers from Dunkirk.
-I'm not really sure what an armada is, maybe it means like, a large amount. They use this word to make is seem more intense and amazing I guess.
2. Which parts of this newspaper story might a French reporter, and a German reporter have written differently? Explain your answer.
-Well, they would have written it different so that it would appeal more to their own country. It reminds me of TOK class in a sense, because in the book Grendel, there is a shaper, who goes from village to village, telling stories about the war, but the story always appeals more to the person whom he is telling it to.
Monday, November 16, 2009
Causes of WWII paper 2
The failure of the League of Nation’s attempt at collective security was a significant cause of WWII, although it is hard to claim that it is the main cause. This is because there were so many other contributing factors which may have led up to WWII ultimately happening. In addition to the Failure of the League of Nations, I think it is important to recognize the problems in the peace conferences, especially the Treaty of Versailles, which contributed significantly to the outbreak of WWII.
The purpose of the League of Nations was to promote collective security. Collective security was a pact that many countries belonged to, where they agreed to basically hold up each other’s back in a time of crisis. It was a way of maintaining allies and security during times of crisis. However, the League of Nations failed at this idea of collective security for several reasons. The first problem was that the main world powers were never in the League of Nations at the same time. For instance, the United States never joined because they were reluctant to goto war. If they had joined, because of their wealth, the other countries that were part of the League of Nations would have had a better sense of security. Then, the other main powers sort of rotated the time frame of when they were members of the League, which posed problems because once again no one who could give the other countries a sense of security was a part of the League at the same time. Germany was in the League from 1926-1933, and then USSR didn’t join the League until 1934. Once USSR joins the League, Italy left a year later in 1935. It appears as though the League had huge problems at cooperation, which is concerning considering they were trying to obtain collective security. Considering the League of Nations couldn’t even keep peace within them, there is no question that these problems helped contribute to WWII.
Something else that should be looked at when examining the causes of WWII is the mistakes that were made in the peace conferences, especially when developing the Treaty of Versailles. These mistakes that were made can help to argue that WWI never ended, which is what could have led to WWII. The Treaty of Versailles was extremely harsh to Germany, which angered the German people. They felt as though they were excluded from the treaty, which was true in a sense. The Treaty focused on them having to pay extreme reparations, and it was as if they were the only ones targeted. Also, the Germans were forced to sign a War Guilt Clause, where they basically said that everything was their fault. This obviously enraged the German people into wanting to seek revenge, which could be argued that it contributed to WWII. The interpretation of the Treaty of Versailles in resulting in WWII could also be viewed in a different way. Because of the harshness of the Treaty of Versailles, it is said that WWI never actually ended. Usually in order for a war to end, peace is needed to be made between the countries fighting. However, because Germany was extremely excluded from the Treaty, historians say that WWI never ended because peace was never actually made. Therefore, this ongoing tension between countries, which resulted from the Treaty of Versailles, could have also resulted in World War Two. Also, because the Treaty of Versailles was so harsh, Germany refused to pay the reparations. This resulted in France becoming angry and invading the German Ruhr in 1923, which could have contributed significantly to WWII.
In conclusion, the failure of the League of Nations attempt at collective security was a contributing factor to the outbreak of World War Two. However, in addition to this, the harshness of the Treaty of Versailles created many negative things to happen, which all contributed to the outbreak of World War Two as well.